• CancerNews' Avatar

    CancerNews posted an update

    Bad News Over the Phone, a Current Trend that Needs to Change
    Should patients be given a choice on how they wish to receive bad news? One survivor seems to think so.

    JUNE 14, 2019
    Bonnie Annis is a breast cancer survivor, diagnosed in 2014 with stage 2b invasive ductal carcinoma with metastasis to the lymph nodes. She is an avid photographer, freelance writer/blogger, wife, mother and grandmother.

    In 2014, when the call came from the oncologist’s office, I assumed it was to set up an appointment. A few days earlier I’d had several tests performed, including a mammogram, a diagnostic ultrasound and a core needle biopsy. What I didn’t expect was to receive life-changing information in four words.

    Instead of being offered options for an office visit to discuss test results, I was given the news that I had cancer. The information came from a doctor of pathology, a doctor I’d never met. And while she did apologize for being the bearer of bad news, I had to face that devastating phone call alone.

    I assumed, when the mammogram led to more testing, I more than likely had cancer. Although I wasn’t sure. I also assumed, when it was time for the results to be shared with me, I’d be called into the doctor’s office and the blow would have been made a little softer by a face to face discussion.

    But apparently, my case wasn’t an isolated one. According to a study performed by the University of Missouri School of Medicine, more and more people are receiving bad news via telephone. The study was conducted in an effort to determine how patients received their diagnoses. According to the University of Missouri School of Medicine, “The research revealed prior to 2007, about 25% of patients learned of their diagnosis over the telephone. After 2007, that number increased to more than 50 %. Since 2015, that number has grown to 60%. When we analyzed the data, I was completely surprised to find such a clear trend,” said Dr. Jane McElroy, professor of family and community medicine at the MU School of Medicine and lead author of the study. “Historically, physicians have decided to use their best judgment when delivering a diagnosis, whether it’s in person or over the phone. Nowadays, some patients clearly want to hear this information over the phone.”

    In today’s world of instant knowledge, do we really want to receive life-changing news over the phone? Personally, I prefer face to face interaction. That way I can not only hear the words that are being shared; I can also watch body language which often reveals a lot more information.

    When I received the news that I had breast cancer, I couldn’t tell you what the pathologist said after those initial words. My brain shut down. I couldn’t process any more information. Perhaps I was in shock, and rightly so. Whatever the case, I’d have preferred not to have received that important news in such an impersonal way. I’d be willing to bet there are others who feel the same way.

    The University of Missouri School of Medicine is taking into account the way patients prefer the delivery of health news. Dr. Natalie Long, assistant professor of clinical family and community medicine at the MU School of Medicine says, “We are now including additional training for first-year medical students to talk about situations and techniques for breaking bad news over the phone. The digital age has changed our perception of how we want to get news. I think younger patients just want to know news faster.” Long also said, “Many of the same principles taught for delivering bad news in person can be applied to phone conversations. The key is learning beforehand how the patient wishes to be informed. Best practices include making sure the patient is in a good place to talk, using good listening skills, showing empathy, ensuring the patient has a support system around them and developing a follow-up plan.”

    I applaud this university for changing their curriculum by helping sensitize the medical students toward better communication with patients. Although the world we live in today offers instant access and delivery of most anything we choose to know, I’m old school. I want a doctor to sit down with me, have a heartfelt conversation about what’s going on with my body and help me understand how we’re going to fix it. Bad news needs to be handled with kid gloves. Good news, on the other hand, in my humble opinion, can be delivered by any means necessary. I’d even be willing to receive it via two tin cans and a string.

    Maybe soon, doctors will begin routinely asking patients how they’d prefer to receive test results. That way, those who prefer telephone communication could receive it and those who prefer face to face could have their needs met, too.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if in the near future, doctors text or even FaceTime bad news. I’m not going to agree to either of those means of delivery and I hope you won’t either.


  • CancerNews' Avatar

    CancerNews asked a questionCancer

    We are doing a little research survey on length of survivorship....

    23 answers
    • Carool's Avatar

      Kp2018, I agree with Bug! And let’s hope our years all continue to pile up.

      12 days ago
    • Ilovemydoc's Avatar

      One year survivor on 6/5 of endometrial cancer grade 1, stage 1a. Now being tested for thyroid cancer, DNA was inclusive

      10 days ago
    • Gigi3's Avatar

      Diagnosed in 1986 with breast cancer, positive lymph nodes. Had chemo for 6 months. Uterine cancer 16 years later. Had hysterectomy, no other treatment.
      Breast cancer with lung metastasis in 2017. Doing fairly well. If I can go another 15 or 16 years before the next diagnosis, I will be happy.

      about 21 hours ago
  • CancerNews' Avatar
  • CancerNews' Avatar

    CancerNews shared a photo


    A BIG THANK YOU to all the caregivers! Without you, this journey would be soooo much harder. Never forget that we appreciate you!!

    1 Comment
  • CancerNews' Avatar

    CancerNews started following

    Question: supplements?

  • CancerNews' Avatar

    CancerNews asked a questionCancer

    Here is a strange side effect that we heard about from someone....

    4 answers
    • beachbum5817's Avatar

      I have never heard this one either. I have not been overly bothered by mosquitoes as an adult, so I am no judge of whether this is true or not. It will be interesting to hear from others about this.

      18 days ago
    • Skyemberr's Avatar

      They don't seem to bite me anymore. I haven't a mosquito bite me since i started treatment in 2016. We joke here at home that mosquitoes drop dead if they try to bite me due to the radiation and medications I've taken.
      That's probably night right though. I am guessing it has more to do with my diet.

      18 days ago
    • po18guy's Avatar

      Some years back, while in the long-term study of Romidepsin (Istodax), I received an infusion the day before I left for Central America. Once there, I noted that the most pesky of the local biting insects (Zancudos) would land on my skin, remain a moment or two, then simply fly away. No bite. Romidepsin is a biological drug which is excreted through the skin in very small amounts. Apparently once they landed, they sensed something amiss and left the area. Since Dengue and Zika are quite common there, I was rather relieved to see this.

      17 days ago